Multi-Agent vs. Single Agent
Value criterion: Does the interaction process introduce new information that a single agent would not have obtained during generation?
- Multiple agents discussing a single text (debate) – not better than one with equal budget (data processing inequality: sequential passing only loses information).
- Reviewer with external feedback (test results, rendering screenshots, tool calls) – significant improvement: RLEF, WebGen-Agent (26.4% → 51.9%).
Argument boundaries: does not extend to independent multiple sampling and the asymmetry of “easier to check than to generate”.
Cost: multi-agent system is ~15x more expensive than dialogue; tokens explain ~80% of the performance difference.
Related: Proposer-Reviewer, Interaction Topologies, Failure Modes of Multi-Agent Systems